<rss version="2.0"><channel>
<title>The Samate Reference Dataset</title>
<description>This website is a repository of test cases for software assurance tools.</description>
<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD</link>

<item>
	<title>2083 :New test case: Proper bounds ...</title>
	<description>By Paul E. Black, New test case: Proper bounds checking for strcat()[br][br]Still theoretically vulnerable to integer overflow.[br][br]This replaces cases 1322 and 1323.  This is the fixed version of cases 2081 and 2082.</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=2083&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-04-03</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>2082 :New test case: Off-by-one error on ...</title>
	<description>By Paul E. Black, New test case: Off-by-one error on bounds checking for strcat(). PLOVER: NUM.OBO, BUFF.OVER 

This replaces case 1320</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=2082&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-04-03</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>2081 :New test case: No bounds checking ...</title>
	<description>By Paul E. Black, New test case: No bounds checking on buffer during strcat(). PLOVER: BUFF.OVER

This replaces case 1319</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=2081&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-04-03</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1456 :Comment: Syntax error: closing ...</title>
	<description>By Paul E. Black, Comment: Syntax error: closing paren replaced by special character. Replaced by case 2078</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1456&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-04-03</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1323 :Comment: Line 13 concatenates to ...</title>
	<description>By Paul E. Black, Comment: Line 13 concatenates to the environment store, through str, instead of to the local buffer, buf.

This case was replaced by case 2083.
</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1323&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-04-03</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1322 :Comment: Line 13 concatenates to ...</title>
	<description>By Paul E. Black, Comment: Line 13 concatenates to the environment store, through str, instead of to the local buffer, buf. Also test at line 12 should be MAXSIZE, not MAXSIZE + 1.

This case was replaced by case 2083.</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1322&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-04-03</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1320 :Comment: Line 22 concatenates to ...</title>
	<description>By Paul E. Black, Comment: Line 22 concatenates to the environment store, through str, instead of to the local buffer, buf.

This case was replaced by case 2082</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1320&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-04-03</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1319 :Comment: Line 20 concatenates to ...</title>
	<description>By Paul E. Black, Comment: Line 20 concatenates to the environment store, through str, instead of to the local buffer, buf.

This case was replaced by case 2081</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1319&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-04-03</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1493 :Comment: The weakness of this test cases</title>
	<description>By Michael Koo, Comment: The weakness of this test case should be CWE-120 (Classic Buffer Overflow). </description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1493&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-01-21</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1595 :Comment: CWE has deprecated ...</title>
	<description>By Michael Koo, Comment: CWE has deprecated &quot;Miscalculated Null Termination&quot;; due to it was a duplicate of &quot;Improper Null Termination&quot;.  Accordingly, the original weakness name of this test case is changed to new name.</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1595&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-01-02</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1594 :Comment: CWE has deprecated ...</title>
	<description>By Michael Koo, Comment: CWE has deprecated ‘Miscalculated Null Termination’; due to it was a duplicate of ’Improper Null Termination’.  Accordingly, the original weakness name of this test case is changed to new name.</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1594&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-01-02</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1593 :Comment: CWE has deprecated ...</title>
	<description>By Michael Koo, Comment: CWE has deprecated ‘Miscalculated Null Termination’; due to it was a duplicate of ’Improper Null Termination’.  Accordingly, the original weakness name of this test case is changed to new name.</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1593&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-01-02</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1592 :Comment: CWE has deprecated ...</title>
	<description>By Michael Koo, Comment: CWE has deprecated “Miscalculated Null Termination”; due to it was a duplicate of “Improper Null Termination”.  Accordingly, the original weakness name of this test case is changed to new name.</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1592&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-01-02</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1493 :Comment: CWE has deprecated ...</title>
	<description>By Michael Koo, Comment: CWE has deprecated “Miscalculated Null Termination”; due to it was a duplicate of “Improper Null Termination”.  Accordingly, the original weakness name of this test case is changed to new name.</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1493&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-01-02</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>1492 :Comment: CWE has deprecated ...</title>
	<description>By Michael Koo, Comment: CWE has deprecated “Miscalculated Null Termination”; due to it was a duplicate of “Improper Null Termination”.  Accordingly, the original weakness name of this test case is changed to new name.</description>
	<link>http://samate.nist.gov/SRD/view_testcase.php?tID=1492&amp;expandComments=1</link>
	<pubDate>2009-01-02</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>